COPYRIGHTS GOV.
LAW
H.R. 2281
'Rethinking' the Internet by Phyllis Schlafly
H.R. 2281, the WIPO Copyright Treaties Implementation Act and the Internet Copyright Infringement Liability Clarification Act, would
significantly change U.S. copyright law at the behest of the big corporations. Copyrights are, of course, a good thing. But the lobbyists for Hollywood, cable,
software and publishing industries are exploiting temporary confusion on Capitol Hill over high-tech issues.
H.R. 2281 has many provisions that are unacceptable in a free society. It sets up a procedure that effectively turns Internet
service providers into gatekeepers. A competitor, asserting that you are infringing his copyright, can demand that your service provider delete your website, file or
link. H.R. 2281 makes it almost sure that your service provider will punch the Delete button, no matter how insubstantial or frivolous the complaint, because the bill
promises that "a service provider shall not be liable for monetary relief . . . for infringement . . . if the provider . . . responds expeditiously to remove or
disable the reference or link upon notification of claimed infringement.
"
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that, when a service provider receives an intimidating letter on legal letterhead
demanding X, and he knows that if he expeditiously does X he is immune from a lawsuit, most service providers will do X. And presto, your website, file or link -- the
private property of the future -- is taken from you without due process.
H.R. 2281 enables a bully (a corporation or special-interest lobby) to eliminate future Drudges and others by merely intimidating
the Internet service provider. Neither a court order nor even a registered copyright is necessary for a competitor to demand removal of material from the Internet.
The advocates of H.R. 2281 assert that the bill is designed to prohibit "black box" descramblers for cable TV, but the language of
the bill goes far beyond this excuse. The bill will allow seizure of your computer or VCR without advance notice and without any finding of wrongdoing. This bill
imposes prison sentences of up to five years if a Federal court determines that you were using a computer, VCR or website contrary to the rights of a copyright owner.
H.R. 2281 empowers a Federal judge to order the seizure of your personal computer or VCR without any finding of wrongdoing.
A proposed change to allow for 72-hour advance notice was rejected, even though prior notice of a deprivation of property is a
constitutional right of due process. It could take you years of litigation to get your computer returned, and meanwhile your business is ruined just because of an
alleged copyright infringement. The bill provides for a replacement of seized property, but only under certain conditions and only after the damage has already been
done.
Microsoft, Time Warner, Hollywood and the publishing industry, the chief backers of H.R. 2281, should be able to protect themselves
against unauthorized users without new legislation. Big corporations should not be permitted to use Federal prosecutors and judges, spending taxpayer dollars, to
defend corporate interests against competitors.
As Silicon Valley engineers know, the computer industry was developed by the use of reverse engineering of competitors' products for
the purpose of copying interfaces and discovering unpatented features. The Internet itself is built on widespread copying and unfettered competition, with enormous
benefit to the public. H.R. 2281 includes an exemption for reverse engineering, but it is limited to having a "sole purpose" of engineering "necessary" for
interoperability. That is so narrow that it is almost meaningless, and a competitor faces five years in jail if the court disagrees about the necessity or if the
engineer could have learned the same information through a different, perhaps costlier, means.
Congress will be making an enormous mistake if it empowers Federal judges and gatekeepers to control the Internet.
Note: Further information about government monitoring of individuals is contained in the
July Phyllis Schlafly Report called "Liberty vs. Totalitarianism,
Clinton-Style."
Official Copyright Gov. Web site
Find word for word information in laws contained in the Copyright law resources.
Subjects include:
About Copyrights - Copyright Basics
Brochures
Fact Sheets
Regulations
Forms
Historical Documants |
|
